The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki

My Site ... Why Bother?

James Robertson (well respected commentator on all things "intranet") takes issue with the concept of "My site", something Microsoft Sharepoint has introduced to the business world. In essence a "My site" is a personalised homepage that staff members use to maintain their own details and - I think of it as Microsofts (early days) attempt at creating a web-based desktop.

James mentions that "5-10%" mark for people actually customising/personalising their own "My site" and concludes:

I would therefore argue that “my site” functionality implemented today is likely to fail in most organisations. While it may succeed in the future due to cultural or generational changes, this will not change the outcome in the short-term. More importantly, if it fails now, it may not get a second chance when the conditions are more favourable.

At the very least, don’t stake projects or strategies on the use of “my sites”, as this is a very risky option. As I’ve argued in an earlier post, perhaps this is aiming too high, and simpler tailoring may be more effective.


I left the following comment which pretty much sums up my thinking around "My sites":

I agree with you if the premise of a “my site” is to be a place that the users “customise/personalise” - it’s unlikely to happen (5-10% do and therefore 90-95% don’t is the figure I use as well).

However if it’s “merely” the “homepage” of an “intranet” (warning, maximum use of speechmarks breeched) that (cleverly) is used to bring more relevant information based on that person (role, project they’re in, org structure etc etc) then it will be a start.

What I suggest to orgs is that they don’t push the concept of each and eveyone having a “my site” but that it is actually just an “intranet” homepage that (cleverly) knows something about you and adjust accordingly.

Those that discover they can custmise/personalise (the 5-10%) then feel they’ve discovered something extra and are happy as Larry.

(this is based on Sharepoint, a subtly different argument occurs on products that use iGoogle/Netvibes as their inspiration)

What I squash asap is, “We’ll have our own internal Facebook” … no, they won’t.


What do you think - leave a comment on James' post

Comments

Popular articles

Knowing good info from bad - how do we?

The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

3 Actions For Those Being Made Redundant

21 days of Wiki adoption (Wiki Patterns)

Cover Your (Online) Tracks