The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Image
Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki
Reply

Ok, time for me to drop the "2.0"

By /
Enterprise 2.0 ... Web 2.0 ... Recruitment 2.0 ... blah blah blah 2.0 ... it's done it's dash and most people have now raised their website expectations to demand that they "do" and not just "be".

So, along with Ben, Charles, Josh, Richard (some time ago) and a growing band of merry techies I hearby officially drop the "2.0" moniker.

Comments

  1. Anonymous9 October 2008 at 23:42

    Hi Mike - I set up a Ning community called NZ Recruitment 2.0 http://thoughtleaders.ning.com 18 months ago. We have around 210 members. It's not that I can't be bothered changing the name, but I think "Recruitment 2.0" is still very apt. A lot of (but not all) HR and recruitment people are still unfortunately operating firmly in the 1.0 space - they are not all early adopters of social media like yourself. There's a lot of terms du jour like "Cloud", "Talent Cloud", blah blah etc., but I don't feel they encapsulate the changing and multi-faceted nature of things as clearly to a non-technical audience. I agree it's just a label, but it communicates simply to the masses that things are changing. A lot of recruiters wouldn't have a clue about online communities, twitter etc - to them leading edge technologies is SEEK.

    I note that you still quote in your blog 2.0 sources on a regular basis, in relation to enterprise 2.0, govt 2.0 etc.

    I'm sure the terms 3.0 and 4.0 will become more common and that many recruiters will miss out the 2.0 altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike Riversdale13 October 2008 at 22:35

    Hey Paul, I saw the Ning community :-)
    My issue with "2.0" is that it no longer speaks of the underlying difference that "2.0" was from "WWW 1.0" and is generally aimed at saying "We are new". For instance I wouldn't necessarily claim that a lot of "social media" services are "2.0" - most are but not all.

    As for my quotations I will have to pay my son 5c for each one he finds and removes, can't have me being hoisted by my own petard ;-)

    I'll make a bet with you - 3.0, 4.0+ will NEVER catch on, in any realm

    ReplyDelete
  3. Miki Szikszai13 October 2008 at 23:28

    I think Telco 2.0 might still be worth keeping 'cos no-one has really left Telco 1.0 behind yet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike Riversdale14 October 2008 at 22:37

    So really the "2.0" is a differentiator between "new" and "old" but not a lot to do with "Web 2.0" - and that I get

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous14 October 2008 at 23:32

    I agree somewhat with your last comment Mike - I actually first heard the term Recruitment 2.0 before the emergence of Web 2.0 to refer to the brave new world of web-based applicant tracking systems.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mike Riversdale15 October 2008 at 13:48

    Ooooh, so the Web stole it nd made it their own precious ...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular articles

The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Image
Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki

Knowing good info from bad - how do we?

This posting inspired by the latest Gerry McGovern newsletter - read it for his views We vote. As an example, that's the power of Google search - it uses the concept that web pages with the highest 'vote' get put at the top of page 1. The 'vote' is a weighted one using the number of pages that reference it multiplied by a lot of clever algorithmic type activity - highly technical insight from Google themselves . In essence you voted me top of the "mike riversdale" Google list by linking to me. However, voting is spreading through the web in many more ways than simply linking to pages and I believe the driver is that people are starting to use the tools to group themselves into communities. In the good ol' days before " Web 2.0" (say before mid-2005) there were many informal methods of finding the 'best* content' - we would send emails to our mates pointing out cool sites, read about it from dedicated "Best of the Web ..."

Which Laptop Should I Buy?

MiramarMike.co.nz is very nearly wired up with equipment and needs one last thing - the laptop. And for those that have given advice, thanks and please bear with me just a little longer :-) Everyone tells me to get an Apple MacBook Pro but it's a darned expensive beastie. Having said that I am willing to pay a little premium for the ease of use over and above Windows Vista and Ubuntu. Also I have a mate currently traveling the US who's willing to pick up a laptop over there but I'm sure how much cheaper they actually are. And so, three questions I'd love some help with: Should I go for an Apple MacBook Pro no matter what (and why?) Should I get my mate to buy the laptop (any make) in the US? If not buy in US where in NZ/Wellington would you recommend? What do you think - leave a comment My calcs. You can edit this spreadsheet with more options at: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pmxKow-YfvkpQWjvBfAcpVw

How To Facilitate A Barcamp/Unconference

Image
I have been privileged to help create a number of successful barcamps ( Wikipedia ) alongside an ever growing number of committee members here in Wellington over the past few years both public and internally at client sites. I've also attended others around the country which have been mostly awesome but sometimes missing a certain "something". During this time I've managed to crystalise what I believe helps create and facilitate (NOT "run) a successful barcamp - here it is, by all means share it around. Oh, one more thing - barcamps are traditionally held within the realm of the geeks but there's NOTHING about a barcamp that limits it to such an industry and, much like you can hold a traditional conference on any subject under the sun, so you can with a barcamp. What do you need for a barcamp? I've always said you only need the following to get have a barcamp A venue A date A logo People On reflection I should also add, "a need" - dur. The date

3 Actions For Those Being Made Redundant

Image
It sucks out there in Wellington and around the country at the moment as the Government, tech, and media industries cull roles in wide ranging and sweeping actions. No-one except you know how this feels, and only those close to you can understand the impact, but know this, you will survive. 1: Understand, YOU are not redundant. Your role is being made redundant, you are not. For whatever reason the role you've been filling is deemed no longer viable within the organisation you used to work within.  You are not redundant, your role is. This is isn't about you, don't take it personally, this is not a reflection of you. Of course the impact on your life and those you hold close is very personal, but the reason it has happened is not about you. (as a side note, you are not merely your role anyway, you are way more than whatever work thing you were doing) 2: Do not panic! If you can, take time to re-evaluate what you do before shotgunning your CV out to every recruitment agency