The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki

The web, it's just not "weighty" like a good old enterprise piece of software

Thanbks to the Economist for this pictureOne of the arguments I've heard in my time working with (and against) IT Departments is that the web is:
... just a hobby really. I mean, the stuff you can do on the web just isn't weighty enough for large organisations [such as ours].

And I get what they are trying to say. I don't agree with it but I do understand it.

I think the key word is "weighty" and that the underlying feeling is that something like Flickr (say*) just doesn't feel as "heavy", as "strong" or as "industrial strength". And you can sort of see what they mean - Flickr isn't as "heavy" as (say) SAP.

What they are really saying is that "heavy/weighty/..." somehow correlates to "use of brain power". A "weighty" piece of software should, for some reason, make you think and challenge you in the ways of its workings. And so I think they are correct - SAP is "weightier" than Flickr.

However, I don't agree that "weighty" = "useful" (or usable).

Flickr has millions of users, many millions of photos and so from a "amount of storage/usage" it's a weighty product. However, it "just works" - there's no manual, there's no scheduled training days to become certified, it just works for the vast majority that use it.

And because it's so easy to use it calls on a lot less of the users brain power and goes a long way to answering the cry, "Don't make me think!" ... it feels "light".

Unfortunately, for a lot of IT Departments/professionals, "light" has a history of being:
  • amateurish
  • half baked
  • small functionality
  • just a utility
This is the wrong attitude to take today.
"Light" now means, "usable" and "focussed" because the Web 2.0 was born in the consumer world and not in the "unsexy corporate software world". It has to be extremely easy to use because the client base is everyone and anyone form anywhere in the world. It has to work exactly as people expect because there is no IT Department to lean on. It has to work quickly and efficiently as it's a product and everything is one click away from their competitors product.

And that world of consumer products is already infiltrating the work place. The world that people use outside of the work place is the world of consumer products and the expectations are being driven up by it.

IT Departments and "enterprise software vendors" had better catch-up real fast otherwise their world will be washed away under their feet.


* I'm only picking o Flickr as a representative Web 2.0 product not because it's the best by any means
** Picture from The Economist

Comments

Popular articles

Knowing good info from bad - how do we?

The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

3 Actions For Those Being Made Redundant

21 days of Wiki adoption (Wiki Patterns)

Cover Your (Online) Tracks