The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki

Microsoft's use of the "army of JavaScript-typing, buzzword-spouting monkeys"

A fantastic article, How Web 2.0 evangelists make the Microsoft monopoly stronger by Andrew Orlowski, decrying the 'Web 2.0 cult' ("compared the rise of Web 2.0 enthusiasts to the problem the Police has with Freemasons") and how they are now being used by Microsoft to negate the need for regulation.

In a nutshell - we're not a monopoly as the Web is now a platform that anyone can/are using.

But I also love how the article uses some cracking phrases about those, like myself, that are Web 2.0/Enterprise 2.0 evangelists:
  • cult-like
  • relentless self-advancement
  • "Hive Mind"
  • cult/religion
  • web utopians
  • evangelists
  • Emergent People
  • mighty army of JavaScript-typing, buzzword-spouting monkeys
  • happy-go-lucky Digg crowd
There is a hint of truth in what is written.
Me using the word "evangelist" is a prime example of how I (and those "like me") are on a wee bit of a mission, even if the mission is for the good of all (but not from God) ... then again isn't every mission, just ask Dubbya.

Also I (tend to) agree with:
It's a consensus culture that brooks no disagreement - except from the top-down, ironically enough - and reacts to criticism as if being personally attacked.

Not sure about the 'personal attacks' but I too feel a little uncomfortable about how "Web 2.0 = goodness" that some automatically apply. I come from the "if it's good then go for it, who cares what label it's got".

As I said in an email (very Web 1.0) earlier, "Facebook is just a tool" and the same applies to all the "Web 2.0" thingyamajibs - they're just 'tools' to be used. A new friend asked me what I did and I dropped the "Web 2.0" phrase (by mistake) into my answer and he naturally stated that, "I didn't know there was a Web 1.0"

Most people know I love Google services, to the degree that someone recently said I should have "I [heart] Google" tattooed on my person. Google's services weren't (for a long time) "Web 2.0", just bloody useful. I still don't see Google as a Web 2.0 organisation - they don't really operate in the spirit of "Web 2.0" (read more) but that's fine and dandy and I don't care as their services are bloody handy.

Back to the article - my favourite, laugh out loud and share with the world sentence is:
They also speak their own language: a strangulated and weirdly dehumanized collection of buzzwords: "nodes", "community", and "conversation", for example, have had the life flogged out of them.

Those crazy Web 2.0 phrases that no-one understands.
"community" - sorry, I know I've just lost most of you in the jargon! Prepare yourself for the even more esoteric wackiness of "conversation". I mean, Huh? Speak English Mike! You and your 'conversation', what does it all mean?!?!

As for Microsoft using the "Web 2.0" argument to get rid off/stave off regulation - on 'em for being creative.

Oh, and cop a load of this final paragraph:
OS innovation has never been slower: Windows and Mac users have never had to wait longer between OS releases. They've never been unhappier, either: many users of the latest incarnations of these operating systems - Vista and Leopard - feel like abused guinea pigs. And Microsoft and Apple? Never wealthier, thank you very much.

OS = Windows or Mac. Nothing else. Um, Linux (and all other Unix flavours) anyone?

Oh, and The Register (where the article is published) is happy to support "Web 2.0" - this is it's article footer:

Picky, I know but .... I'm feeling picky


Popular articles

The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Knowing good info from bad - how do we?

How To Facilitate A Barcamp/Unconference

21 days of Wiki adoption (Wiki Patterns)

The 3 C’s – Communication, Consultation and Collaboration