The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Well looky here, things one has scanned in eh. (ignore the photo, that's some guy that made some accounting software, not sure what became of him ;) MIKE RIVERSDALE is fuming. The expensive headphones he bought in Sydney three weeks ago have just died. His first reaction is not to randomly spill expletives into his coffee, but to use his iPhone to vent his frustration to his Twitter con- tacts, under the moniker Miramar Mike. "I will also put, 'What should I do?' It's a conversation. I'm reaching out to the people following me." The council predicts hand-held digital devices such as smartphones will rule the world in 2040. They already rule the life of Mr Riversdale, whose company WaveAdept helps businesses adapt - their computing sys- tems to allow staff to work from anywhere - and with anyone. In order of fre- equency, he uses his iPhone to tweet (1136 followers; 8363 tweets since joining), e-mail, make phone calls and use online services, such as checki

Gerry McGovern comments on Google and IM

His article title is Google changes information management and discusses, with his usual directness and humour, how Google has changed the face of information management (IM) - key quote for me (and probably all the organisations I have ever worked for):
In many situations it is easier to find something on a website by using the public Google search engine than by using the website’s own search engine. This is an incredible situation. Think about it. Google, which indexes 12 billion pages, is doing a better job than, for example, a search engine that indexes 12,000.
And his reasoning as to the why is totally on the head:
A great many organizations simply don’t professionally manage their information. They simply store it.
I would, however, add that Google isn't just changing IM, they are taking it out of the hands of the highly paid, jargon using and loosely-coupled-to-reality IM practitioners. They are also forcing it away from IT departments and back into the hands of those that care - those looking to use information. In essence they are "commodifying" the first 2 parts of information management:
  1. Availability - it hasd to be 'out there'
  2. Findab-ility - I have to be able to find it (search, browse, link ...)
And I applaud them - my mantra for "findability" when it comes to search is, "Make it as good as Google". Why wouldn't you - it's what the public want, it's what the public use and it's what the public knows.

I do, however, understand how hard that is - ease of use, excellence in results and presentation are all items that Google spend many many $s on and have extremely clever people applying their considerable brains to. No excuse for not trying AND, if you can't do it then just use Google - after all, they are selling you a commodity, swallow your pride IT people and just buy it.

That's not the whole picture though with the 3rd tenant of IM, usability - once you've got your info you must be able to use it - an address must get you to the place you're wanting to be, a contact must get you in touch with the person or a book review must let you get your hands on the book.

Whilst Google are working hard at this it is an area that is not, yet, merely a piece of functionality that you can buy and plug in. Yet.


Popular articles

The Future As Seen By Me In 2010

Knowing good info from bad - how do we?

How To Facilitate A Barcamp/Unconference

21 days of Wiki adoption (Wiki Patterns)

The 3 C’s – Communication, Consultation and Collaboration