I only ever want to see stuff that's relevant to me at the time I ask for it and one of the main ways I find stuff is by searching and, like most, I use Google to search. It's pretty good to know that 70% of their efforts and resources go into making search results more relevant - the better they are the better they can generate revenue (think better targetting of ads and the like).And this is an example of totally relevant results.
Situation: I wanted to find the Burger King website for a link in a previous post. I am writing this in New Zealand and that's about all they knew about me (I wasn't logged in so they didn't know who I was).
Search: Google (defaulted to the NZ site for me) using "Burger King"
http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=burger+king&btnG=Search&hs=R3U&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial
Results: Totally relevant! First of all I get the three main Burger King sites, BK International, BK outside of the US and BK NZ. These are not only separated from the other results (ie, they know that these are the most relevant and related results) but they then show sub-links to nutritional information, restaurant locations and the menu.
Next the results know (how?) that in Australia, which is close to NZ, Burger King is also known as Hungry Jacks and has a sub-set of results linked to BK/JHungry Jacks.
Finally we head off into other Burger King content.
Now that's what I call relevant results for a search.
Tried it on the following and got a mixed bag of results:
- McDonalds - not as good
- Christchurch City Council - normal
- US Government - sub-links good
- BBC - again, sub-links good but not the grouping of pages
Comments
Post a Comment